Ask : What are your thoughts on Nita Neary not being able to recognize Ted? Do you think her testimony should have been thrown out, since she incorrectly identified the assailant the first time? She doesn’t seem like a very credible witness to me.

Her testimony probably should have been thrown out because she wasn’t reliable but in the end it didn’t really matter as the jury thought she wasn’t credible either. What got Ted in the end was the bite mark.

One thought on “Ask : What are your thoughts on Nita Neary not being able to recognize Ted? Do you think her testimony should have been thrown out, since she incorrectly identified the assailant the first time? She doesn’t seem like a very credible witness to me.

  1. I’m with you on the N.N. testimony. From everything I have read I just don’t understand how she was able to get a good enough look in profile with dark/shadows/light all playing parts? Then there is the ridiculous and laughably bad “sketch,” of the intruder that looks like a three year old drew it, and that might be insulting to three year olds.

    I have zero doubt that he did it. I mean, not any. But her testimony was a train wreck of bad memory, hypnosis, bad sketch work etc…

    I agree with the owner of this archive. The bite mark evidence is what got him

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s